VB Август

[A. 876]

Windows Vista x64 - August 2007

CA eTrust - FAIL

Fortinet Forticlient - FAIL

Ikarus Virus Utilities - FAIL

Trend Micro Client Server Security - FAIL

Trend Micro OfficeScan - FAIL

Trend Micro PC-cillin - FAIL

VirusBuster VirusBuster - FAIL

=======

Trend Micro submitted three of its anti-virus products, all of which falsely identified a Microsoft development tool as spyware. Other products to generate false positives were Fortinet's FortiClient, Ikarus Utilities, and VirusBuster, from the Hungarian firm of the same name.

John Hawes, technical consultant at Virus Bulletin, said: "The items added to our set of known clean files this month mostly consisted of common items taken from the 'most-popular' lists of free download sites, so it is a concern that the additions have caused such an upsurge in false detections.

"A false positive can cause as much disruption as a virus infection. False warnings often lead end-users to delete valid files in the belief that they are some form of attack and the resultant damage can be significant," he added.

Hawes blamed increased reliance on heuristic (generic) detection techniques for the rash of false alarms. "Anti-malware vendors must work hard to minimise false detections."

Other factors might also be in play.

Some anti-virus vendors complained of lack of access to the PatchGuard kernel protection system, as well as other security measures, included in the 64-bit version of Vista prior to its release. Opinions over the issue - even within the anti-virus industry - were sharply split.

Virus Bulletin reckons poor results of tests from anti-malware products on 64-bit versions of Vista suggest Microsoft's efforts at locking down the operating system have made life tougher for security firms.

Microsoft's enterprise anti-malware technology Forefront put in a strong performance and was awarded VB100 status for Vista x64 in the latest tests. By contrast, OneCare, its consumer anti-virus product, received a good shoeing after flunking Virus Bulletin's tests on 32-bit Vista products earlier this year.

Testing times

Virus Bulletin's VB100 test pit submitted anti-virus products against a test set of viruses from the WildList, a publicly available list of viruses known to be in circulation. To earn VB100 certification, products must be able to detect 100 per cent of the malware samples contained in the WildList test set while avoiding any false alarms in scanning a set of clean files.

Unlike other certification schemes, Virus Bulletin tests all products free of charge and does not allow re-testing. Virus Bulletin's comparative reviews also cover other performance aspects including detection rates against a selection of viruses never seen outside the lab of anti-virus vendors as well as looking at scanning speeds and performance overheads for anti-malware products.

[alexgr 556]

Windows Vista x64 - August 2007

CA eTrust - FAIL

Fortinet Forticlient - FAIL

Ikarus Virus Utilities - FAIL

Trend Micro Client Server Security - FAIL

Trend Micro OfficeScan - FAIL

Trend Micro PC-cillin - FAIL

VirusBuster VirusBuster - FAIL

=======

Trend Micro submitted three of its anti-virus products, all of which falsely identified a Microsoft development tool as spyware. Other products to generate false positives were Fortinet's FortiClient, Ikarus Utilities, and VirusBuster, from the Hungarian firm of the same name.

John Hawes, technical consultant at Virus Bulletin, said: "The items added to our set of known clean files this month mostly consisted of common items taken from the 'most-popular' lists of free download sites, so it is a concern that the additions have caused such an upsurge in false detections.

"A false positive can cause as much disruption as a virus infection. False warnings often lead end-users to delete valid files in the belief that they are some form of attack and the resultant damage can be significant," he added.

Hawes blamed increased reliance on heuristic (generic) detection techniques for the rash of false alarms. "Anti-malware vendors must work hard to minimise false detections."

Other factors might also be in play.

Some anti-virus vendors complained of lack of access to the PatchGuard kernel protection system, as well as other security measures, included in the 64-bit version of Vista prior to its release. Opinions over the issue - even within the anti-virus industry - were sharply split.

Virus Bulletin reckons poor results of tests from anti-malware products on 64-bit versions of Vista suggest Microsoft's efforts at locking down the operating system have made life tougher for security firms.

Microsoft's enterprise anti-malware technology Forefront put in a strong performance and was awarded VB100 status for Vista x64 in the latest tests. By contrast, OneCare, its consumer anti-virus product, received a good shoeing after flunking Virus Bulletin's tests on 32-bit Vista products earlier this year.

Testing times

Virus Bulletin's VB100 test pit submitted anti-virus products against a test set of viruses from the WildList, a publicly available list of viruses known to be in circulation. To earn VB100 certification, products must be able to detect 100 per cent of the malware samples contained in the WildList test set while avoiding any false alarms in scanning a set of clean files.

Unlike other certification schemes, Virus Bulletin tests all products free of charge and does not allow re-testing. Virus Bulletin's comparative reviews also cover other performance aspects including detection rates against a selection of viruses never seen outside the lab of anti-virus vendors as well as looking at scanning speeds and performance overheads for anti-malware products.

Заабвно видеть в этом списке компанию, которая на Cebit 2007 чуть ли громче всех кричала о поддержке Vista, причем полной Всегда был в прошлой жизни поклонником японского качества. Наталкивает на некоторые мысли єнто все....

[Пит 15]

Заабвно видеть в этом списке компанию, которая на Cebit 2007 чуть ли громче всех кричала о поддержке Vista,

Ну и что. Я бы на их месте ещё кричал про продажный тест, и неправильные вирусы.

[Demorphis 0]

Ну а где же наши уважаемые Тренд Микровцы? Почему неактивны в топике?

Вот вам и "местечковый" аукнулось!

Как видим Трэнд Микро по результатам теста, находятся в довольно неприятном "местечке", вместе с их, как уже отмечалось, заверениями

[Dmitry Perets 30]

Ну а где же наши уважаемые Тренд Микровцы? Почему неактивны в топике?

Вот вам и "местечковый" аукнулось!

Как видим Трэнд Микро по результатам теста, находятся в довольно неприятном "местечке", вместе с их, как уже отмечалось, заверениями

Ай, да ладно вам... Уже сколько раз говорили про этот смешной тест... Это традиция такая. Все этот тест хотя бы по разу проигрывают, все по разу обсуждают его бесценность и продажность и все потом успокаиваются =) Вывод только один: если кто-то этим тестом пиарится, то это он зря. Потому что рано или поздно он его завалит, и будет облом =)

[Олег Рагозин 10]

Ну а где же наши уважаемые Тренд Микровцы? Почему неактивны в топике?

Вот вам и "местечковый" аукнулось! Smile

А как насчет бревна в своем глазу, напомнить проход "местечкового" в июне 2007 на Windows XP SP2? Кто-то придает значение этому тесту, кто то нет, об этом уже говорили неоднократно здесь. Однако прежде чем танцевать на чужих костях, посмотрите не танцует ли кто на ваших.

Потому что рано или поздно он его завалит, и будет облом =)

Очень верное замечание. Вспомнить хотя бы историю с Eset как раз на этой почве

[Сергей Ильин 1538]

Вспомнить хотя бы историю с Eset как раз на этой почве Smile

Не очень показательный пример, так как Eset все же задним числом после "длительных переговоров" VB100% дали :wink:

Вот с Касперским - да, они после провала Eset, слишком радовались этому.